There seems to be a common misconception that keeps circulating in cigar culture that the wrapper type determines the aging potential of a cigar. The thinking is that the darker the wrapper, the better the cigar will age.
It’s not only wrong, it’s ridiculous.
A cigar is a complete system, with wrapper, binder, filler, fermentation, añejamiento, and more working in concert to give us flavor profile, strength, body, and aging potential. The wrapper certainly has influence, but it’s only one component in a long chain of other factors.
If I sound annoyed, it’s because I am.
This is the same type of thinking that’s applied to strength: the darker the wrapper, the stronger the cigar.
And we should already know better.
What annoys me about stuff like this is that it’s too quick a take on something that’s far more sophisticated than a single factor like wrapper color. And as I mentioned in “Recommending Cigars to Beginners,” it’s lazy thinking.
When we talk about aging potential, we’re faced with a conundrum: it’s virtually impossible to determine the aging potential of any cigar. You can study the blend, the fermentation, the curing, and all sorts of other factors, and you might be able to make an educated guess, but you can never be certain.
For instance, one of my favorite daily drivers is the Oliva Black Swan. It has a dark, almost black, Connecticut Broadleaf wrapper over an Ecuadorian binder and Nicaraguan fillers. On paper, it looks like it should age well with the robust tobaccos used in the blend. But in my experience, it ages out in four months.
On the other hand, the Don Pepin Garcia Cuban Classic 1950 has a super-light Corojo wrapper over Nicaraguan fillers. According to the conventional logic, its lighter color should make it less age-worthy. But that cigar requires at least a year before it’s ready to smoke.
That’s the problem with equating wrapper type or color with aging potential. It doesn’t work.
The most reliable way to understand the aging potential of a cigar is to buy several of the same cigar and smoke them over a long period of time.
Time is the keyword.
Time doesn’t build a cigar’s character. It reveals it.
Over time, a cigar changes. The components settle into each other, and the profile can become more integrated. Rough edges can smooth out. Strength can mellow. Body can soften and become more cohesive.
But here’s the thing: that doesn’t mean the cigar improves with time.
It only means time has acted on it.
Whether time benefits the cigar is anyone’s guess. It may bring the cigar into better focus, or it may simply shift the experience into something softer, more settled, and different from where it started.
That’s why aging cigars is less about certainty and more about observation.
That’s why buying several of the same cigar is useful. You smoke one young, then another after a couple of months, and another in a year. You pay attention to what changed, what improved, what faded, and what stayed the same.
That’s how you learn a cigar’s aging potential.
In short, aging potential can’t be predicted. It can only be observed.
So next time someone tells you that Connies don’t age well, or that dark wrappers age better, take it for what it is.
A shortcut. Not a rule.
Leave a comment